Voting paradox

Under the current electoral method of plurality of which, in other ways of being elected a candidate for the most people can't vote for? The election results are an unfair if be thought of how election that is still many, and perhaps all men are hard to understand why not? See you, by applying the principle of the polls to choose its preferred candidate in mathematics.

Democracy is a priority by the will of the national policy is decided. Can happen in the process, confrontation between two parties with different opinions is a considerable time to resolve issues, and this is followed by a discussion, persuasion and negotiation. Reach an agreement for an adequate debate, policy has been determined and, although the group that opposed the policy, even, if I say we implement that policy to cooperate with the. Of course this was an ideal situation, so the reality isn't always like this is not. This is the representatives of the people get together and also indirect limitations of democracy that will determine the policy not exceeding ··· days

This situation often occurs in the election . Lawmakers to pull the current system is a typical system of majority rule . This approach is the candidate with the most votes is elected by rational , so at first glance looks like a good system is not the problem . Are you sure?

Which of the three candidates running for the constituency vote to investigate saw A is 40%, B is 33%, C 27% was a let . A candidate showed 40% of the vote is elected there seems to have no problem . A poll in the way for pre- B, B vs. C, A vs. C, all comments muleotdeoni A, B and C if we break it out ? In other words , B and C do not want any one to vote for all A , A, B, C are all candidates the voters do not like naohmyeonseo A table is distributed to B and C to A is elected as the wind will eobujiri . This will not only defeated by B and C of 60% ( = 33% +27 %) to reach voters at the election results have a complaint . To resolve this issue, B and C , the single candidate to see, this also is not a simple matter . For example , B and C , then B will win the battle , but , A to B to C and A to C confrontation could win overwhelmingly because A . In this case, the candidate who should be unified into troubled sore .